[Spice-devel] [PATCH] macros: make SPICE_CONTAINEROF more typesafe
Christophe Fergeau
cfergeau at redhat.com
Tue Jan 12 07:39:58 PST 2016
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:30:53AM -0500, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> >
> > Hey,
> >
> > I just realized that this patch breaks the build of spice 0.12.6 (and
> > earlier). I don't think upgrading spice-protocol should cause such
> > breakage, if we can't turn this to a warning, I would revert the patch
> > (or wrap it in some #ifdef SPICE_STRICT_TYPE_CHECK)
> >
> > Christophe
> >
>
> Won't be better to fix the code?
We cannot fix the code of already released spice-server versions.
> And why old versions should use a newer spice-protocol ?
Imo the question is rather the opposite one, spice-protocol has been
backward-compatible so far, any new enough spice-protocol release can be
used to build a release of spice-server. I don't think this patch is a
very good reason to stop doing that.
Christophe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/spice-devel/attachments/20160112/fab5f912/attachment.sig>
More information about the Spice-devel
mailing list