[Spice-devel] [PATCH server v2 03/13] tests: make sure all tests are built on default rule
Jonathon Jongsma
jjongsma at redhat.com
Mon Jan 18 14:35:19 PST 2016
On Fri, 2016-01-15 at 09:08 -0500, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > >
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Frediano Ziglio <fziglio at redhat.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Subject: [PATCH server v2 03/13] tests: make sure all tests are
> > > > > > built
> > > > > > on
> > > > > > default rule
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We should have all or none, I don't see the point of having just
> > > > > > some
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > them.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't know why but this description (and subject) looks odd to me.
> > > > >
> > > > > I would put something like (if I understood it):
> > > > >
> > > > > "Programs listed in noinst_PROGRAMS inherit default rule/settings to
> > > > > list
> > > > > all
> > > > > tests program also in this macro"
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I don't mind changing the text, but I really don't understand yours ;)
> > > >
> > >
> > > That means I didn't get the reason of the change.
> > >
> > > What's a rule for you?
> > >
> > > output: source
> > > do_something_to_generate_output_from_source
> > >
> > > is a rule
> > >
> > > TESTS = xxx
> > >
> > > is a variable (also called macro)
> >
> > Yes
> >
> > the default rule being "all", it builds noinst_PROGRAMS but not
> > check_PROGRAMS. I prefer either build all with noinst_PROGRAMS or none (in
> > which case we should remove some of them duplicated in check_PROGRAMS)
> >
>
> Really didn't get it before :)
> Can you post again with an updated comment?
>
> Frediano
I didn't fully understand the original comment either (nor did I really
understand Frediano's suggested alternative ;).
I think that even a simple re-wording would make it a little more clear:
"Make sure that the default rule builds all tests."
>
> > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau at gmail.com>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > server/tests/Makefile.am | 15 +++++++--------
> > > > > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/server/tests/Makefile.am b/server/tests/Makefile.am
> > > > > > index 15196f9..007930c 100644
> > > > > > --- a/server/tests/Makefile.am
> > > > > > +++ b/server/tests/Makefile.am
> > > > > > @@ -35,6 +35,12 @@ LDADD =
> > > > > > \
> > > > > > $(SPICE_NONPKGCONFIG_LIBS) \
> > > > > > $(NULL)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +TESTS = \
> > > > > > + stat_test \
> > > > > > + stream-test \
> > > > > > + test-qxl-parsing \
> > > > > > + $(NULL)
> > > > > > +
> > > > >
> > > > > Why did you moved above? This just make the patch bigger.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > It's saner/simpler to define before use.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Let's say that is more similar to assignment and other languages so
> > > it's easier to read by people not very friendly with Makefiles
> > > (and honestly I think that many developers does not really like
> > > Makefiles).
> > >
> > > > > > noinst_PROGRAMS = \
> > > > > > test_display_no_ssl \
> > > > > > test_display_streaming \
> > > > > > @@ -47,14 +53,7 @@ noinst_PROGRAMS = \
> > > > > > test_vdagent \
> > > > > > test_display_width_stride \
> > > > > > spice-server-replay \
> > > > > > - stream-test \
> > > > > > - stat_test \
> > > > > > - $(NULL)
> > > > > > -
> > > > > > -TESTS = \
> > > > > > - stat_test \
> > > > > > - test-qxl-parsing \
> > > > > > - stream-test \
> > > > > > + $(TESTS) \
> > > > > > $(NULL)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > check_PROGRAMS = $(TESTS)
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > 2.5.0
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Frediano
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Marc-André Lureau
> > > >
> _______________________________________________
> Spice-devel mailing list
> Spice-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
More information about the Spice-devel
mailing list