[Spice-devel] [PATCH spice-common] Make LZ4 dependency check more robust
Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)
etrunko at redhat.com
Thu Jun 16 13:02:24 UTC 2016
On 06/16/2016 07:03 AM, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 04:35:14PM -0300, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) wrote:
>> Add a new 'have_lz4' variable to really tell if we have the dependency
>
> "Add a new 'HAVE_LZ4' automake conditional"
>
>> installed on the system. It will later be used in Makefile to decide
>> whether or not the specific files related to LZ4 should be built.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) <etrunko at redhat.com>
>> ---
>> m4/spice-deps.m4 | 12 ++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/m4/spice-deps.m4 b/m4/spice-deps.m4
>> index 2e2fcf5..a114e4f 100644
>> --- a/m4/spice-deps.m4
>> +++ b/m4/spice-deps.m4
>> @@ -185,14 +185,18 @@ AC_DEFUN([SPICE_CHECK_LZ4], [
>>
>> if test "x$enable_lz4" != "xno"; then
>> PKG_CHECK_MODULES([LZ4], [liblz4],
>> - [enable_lz4=yes
>> + [have_lz4="yes"
>> AC_DEFINE(USE_LZ4, [1], [Define to build with lz4 support])
>> ],
>> - [if test "x$enable_lz4" = "xyes"; then
>> - AC_MSG_ERROR([lz4 support requested but liblz4 could not be found])
>> - fi]
>> + [have_lz4="no"
>> + if test "x$enable_lz4" = "xyes"; then
>> + AC_MSG_ERROR([lz4 support requested but liblz4 could not be found])
>> + fi]
>> )
>> + else
>> + have_lz4=no
>> fi
>> + AM_CONDITIONAL(HAVE_LZ4, test "x$have_lz4" = "xyes")
>> ])
>
> I think this whole change could just be:
>
> + AM_CONDITIONAL(HAVE_LZ4, test "x$enable_lz4" = "xyes")
>
> If you prefer to go with an additional have_lz4, I'd prefer to make it
> closer to the SPICE_CHECK_SMARTCARD check for consistency reasons
> (ie don't nest AC_DEFINE/AC_MSG_ERROR in PKG_CHECK_MODULES() but only
> set have_lz4 in PKG_CHECK_MODULES() and do the rest after it).
I prefer it this way too. I will follow the smartcard check.
--
Eduardo de Barros Lima (Etrunko)
Software Engineer - RedHat
etrunko at redhat.com
More information about the Spice-devel
mailing list