[Spice-devel] [spice-gtk] vmcstream, gtask: Do idle ourself as GTask's return gets messed up
Marc-André Lureau
mlureau at redhat.com
Tue Mar 22 19:40:08 UTC 2016
Hi
----- Original Message -----
> Seems that our coroutines can mess up with GTask's return, ending up
> in an early return from g_task_return_now() instead of doing a return
> in idle.
> As I still don't know if the bug is on spice-gtk or on GTask itself,
> I've opened a bug[0] in spice-gtk's bugzilla and also made a reference
> to the very same bug in the code.
>
> [0]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94662
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabiano FidĂȘncio <fidencio at redhat.com>
Is it easy to reproduce the issue? Just use webdav channel? Is there a crash & backtrace?
> ---
> src/vmcstream.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/vmcstream.c b/src/vmcstream.c
> index 5ebf15a..4db94c7 100644
> --- a/src/vmcstream.c
> +++ b/src/vmcstream.c
> @@ -97,6 +97,30 @@ spice_vmc_input_stream_new(void)
> return self;
> }
>
> +typedef struct _complete_in_idle_cb_data {
> + GTask *task;
> + gssize pos;
> +} complete_in_idle_cb_data;
> +
> +static void
> +complete_in_idle_cb_data_free (gpointer user_data)
> +{
> + complete_in_idle_cb_data *data = user_data;
> +
> + g_object_unref (data->task);
> + g_free (data);
> +}
> +
> +static gboolean
> +complete_in_idle_cb(gpointer user_data)
> +{
> + complete_in_idle_cb_data *data = user_data;
> +
> + g_task_return_int(data->task, data->pos);
> +
> + return FALSE;
> +}
> +
> /* coroutine */
> /**
> * Feed a SpiceVmc stream with new data from a coroutine
> @@ -116,6 +140,9 @@ spice_vmc_input_stream_co_data(SpiceVmcInputStream *self,
> self->coroutine = coroutine_self();
>
> while (size > 0) {
> + complete_in_idle_cb_data *cb_data;
> + GSource *source;
> +
> SPICE_DEBUG("spicevmc co_data %p", self->task);
> if (!self->task)
> coroutine_yield(NULL);
> @@ -137,10 +164,25 @@ spice_vmc_input_stream_co_data(SpiceVmcInputStream
> *self,
> if (self->all && min > 0 && self->pos != self->count)
> continue;
>
> - g_task_return_int(self->task, self->pos);
> + /* Somehow we are messing up with GTask return. As it's not known
> + * for now if it's a spice-gtk issue due to the coroutine usage or
> + * a GTask issue itself, let's do the idle ourself.
> + *
> + * For a future reference, see:
> + * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94662
> + */
> + cb_data = g_new(complete_in_idle_cb_data , 1);
> + cb_data->task = g_object_ref(self->task);
> + cb_data->pos = self->pos;
> +
> + source = g_idle_source_new ();
> + g_source_set_priority (source, G_PRIORITY_DEFAULT);
> + g_source_set_callback (source, complete_in_idle_cb, cb_data,
> complete_in_idle_cb_data_free);
> + g_source_attach (source, g_task_get_context(self->task));
> + g_source_set_name (source, "[spice-gtk] complete_in_idle_cb");
> + g_source_unref (source);
Why not use just g_idle_add()?
>
> g_cancellable_disconnect(g_task_get_cancellable(self->task),
> self->cancel_id);
> -
> g_clear_object(&self->task);
> }
>
> --
> 2.5.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spice-devel mailing list
> Spice-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
>
More information about the Spice-devel
mailing list