[Spice-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] Protocol file syntax documentation

[Frediano Ziglio]

> 
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 01:13:04PM +0200, Victor Toso wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 07:08:55AM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > > Just to make it clear... do you mean spice-server repository?
> > 
> > Yes. We already have the (old) docs there and I don't see a reason to
> > move it to protocol/common/website git...
> 
> For what it's worth, once upon a time, there was no spice-common
> submodule, and there was no spice-gtk either, everything (client and
> server) was in spice/, so the docs were there too. Then spice-gtk was
> created, and spice-common/ was split up as a submodule to share code
> between the 2. The doc stayed in spice/, but I would not say this was an
> explicit decision :)
> 
> I still think that the .proto files (and so this doc) belongs to
> spice-protocol, but at this point this has not happened :)
> 
> With that said, no strong feeling where it belongs, along with the
> existing documentation works for me even if a bit odd, in spice-common
> makes sense to me too.
> 
> Christophe
> 

I think choices proposed was:

- spice-common
  pro: files documented (.proto and python) are there
  cons: there are no doc directory
- spice-procotol
  pro: looks a good repository name
  cons: no files
  cons: no doc directory
- spice-server
  pro: already documentation
  cons: not strictly related
- website
  pro: easy to publish
  cons: website should contain released state, not development

My choice order is:
- spice-server
- spice-common
- website
- spice-protocol

Frediano