[Spice-devel] spice performance tweaking

Rob Verduijn rob.verduijn at gmail.com
Thu Sep 15 14:04:51 UTC 2016


Hello,

The performance fixes sound awesome.
I'm afraid I cannot test them in the environment with the low bandwith
setup soon (maybe next week, but don't hold your breath)
I'm going to build a local test setup to see if this is improving some of
the issues. I got a laptop running the rhel7.3 beta, let's see how that
performs.

Rob Verduijn


2016-09-15 13:31 GMT+02:00 Frediano Ziglio <fziglio at redhat.com>:

> I saw you are using CentOS 7. I built the package with RHEL 7 (they are
> binary compatible).
> About the testing just which normal usage you should see improvements in
> bandwidth and
> reactivity.
>
> Changes from current CentOS package:
> - used a newer version, there are couple of changes that decrease latency;
> - additional patches to improve bandwidth usage (for small drawing this
> should decrease
>   bandwidth usage by a 15-20%);
> - additional patch to decrease a bandwidth limitation due to a peculiar
> half-duplex usage
>   of spice protocol (this is clearly visible with high latency
> connections);
> - additional patch to decrease packet fragmentation due to TCP_NODELAY
> usage.
>
> Alternatively would be helpful for us to get a local reproduction of the
> problem.
> OpenVPN configuration files would be helpful (we don't need any security
> detail like keys, ip, host or system names, just to understand the type of
> VPN,
> encryption parameters, compression, additional latency introduced and so
> on).
>
> The fact that you are not able to get a record from the guest means that
> the QXL
> (guest <-> server) protocol how the spice-server is handling guest command
> is
> fine. The fact that on the client you can see clearly such slowness is due
> to spice
> protocol, the connection/vpn, some spice-server implementation and possibly
> client implementation too. Unfortunately too much stuff to be able to
> point the
> finger to one of them.
> I tried some test and did this:
> - opened task manager on Windows 7;
> - switched to performance tab;
> - maximized task manager;
> - double clicked on CPU usage to get only CPU usage and history.
> When CPU usage change I can see the flickering on CPU usage but not on
> the history graphs. It this the kind of flickering you are noticing?
>
> Frediano
>
>
> For which distro is that package ?
> Centos 7.2 ? rhel7.3beta or fedora24 ?
>
> Rob Verduijn
>
> 2016-09-14 15:59 GMT+02:00 Frediano Ziglio <fziglio at redhat.com>:
>
>> Could you test at least? Would be very helpful. We could then backport
>> some improvements.
>>
>> Frediano
>>
>>
>> thanx,I'll stick with the centos packages,
>>
>> I need a very good reason before I start using beta packages.
>> And a nice to have feature is not one of them.
>>
>> Also I dug in to the openvpn tweaks and it seems that all of them are
>> related to udp tunnels.
>> Performance is sadly rather low when you have to use tcp (like me)
>> because the firewall is managed by a third party.
>>
>> Rob Verduijn
>>
>> 2016-09-14 15:49 GMT+02:00 Frediano Ziglio <fziglio at redhat.com>:
>>
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to improve my spice performance on a kvm host/guest.
>>> It's currently rather slow and I can see screens beeing build up, and
>>> delays when draging windows.
>>>
>>> It's being tunneled through openvpn, which is set to use tcp.
>>> tcp required because of the firewall which is maintained by 3rd party.
>>>
>>> I have full access to the kvm host, kvm guest and openvpn server.
>>>
>>> Have you got any tips so that I can improve spice performance ?
>>> I alrready am running tuned with the virtual-guest profile for  guests
>>> and host profile for the host.
>>> All systems are runnning CentOS 7
>>>
>>> Any tips for :
>>> - the KVM host ?
>>> - the KVM guest ?
>>> - the openvpn server ?
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Rob Verduijn
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>   can you try version at https://www.datafilehost.com/d/b07f008e ?
>>>
>>> The sha1 hash (please check it) is 0e2191c363e109475aeb2bff401e69
>>> 9f0a07a795.
>>>
>>> Be prepare for the rollback, it's not a version meant for production
>>> usage.
>>>
>>> Frediano
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/spice-devel/attachments/20160915/4eba379c/attachment.html>


More information about the Spice-devel mailing list