[Spice-devel] [spice v8] dcc: handle preferred video codec message

Victor Toso victortoso at redhat.com
Fri Feb 10 13:14:11 UTC 2017


Hi,

On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 07:51:05AM -0500, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > [0] SPICE_MSGC_DISPLAY_PREFERRED_VIDEO_CODEC_TYPE
> > 
> > This message provides a list of video codecs based on client's order
> > of preference.
> > 
> > We duplicate the video codecs array from reds.c and sort it using the
> > order of codecs as reference.
> > 
> > This message will not change an ongoing streaming but it could change
> > newly created streams depending the rank value of each video codec
> > that can be set by spice_server_set_video_codecs()
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Victor Toso <victortoso at redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  server/dcc-private.h     |   5 ++
> >  server/dcc.c             | 126
> >  +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  server/dcc.h             |   1 +
> >  server/display-channel.c |   2 +
> >  server/stream.c          |   5 +-
> >  5 files changed, 138 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/server/dcc-private.h b/server/dcc-private.h
> > index 64b32a7..dd54c70 100644
> > --- a/server/dcc-private.h
> > +++ b/server/dcc-private.h
> > @@ -51,6 +51,11 @@ struct DisplayChannelClientPrivate
> >          int num_pixmap_cache_items;
> >      } send_data;
> >  
> > +    /* Host prefererred video-codec order sorted with client preferred */
> > +    GArray *preferred_video_codecs;
>
> I know this patch is important but every time I arrive here I ask
> "array of what?" and I close the email.

Ah :(

>
> C has type[] or type*... GArray is an array of everything you want...
> I don't like it!

I used GArray here to keep consistency as we already use GArray for this
RedVideoCodec struct in other places and this code actually interact
with it.

I don't mind moving it to GPtrArray, at least you know that it will be
an array of pointers.

Let me know what you think as while I was discussion with Pavel this
morning, he find out another issue in the patch, which I plan to fix it
in a followup patch later on.

PS: You do read the spice code tons of time more then I do, so I might
not agree but I would do the change for what you think is more legible
here (unless others disagree, of course)

Cheers,
        toso

>
> Frediano
> _______________________________________________
> Spice-devel mailing list
> Spice-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/spice-devel/attachments/20170210/0def334c/attachment.sig>


More information about the Spice-devel mailing list