[Spice-devel] [PATCH 4/5] DisplayChannel: use proper function name conventions
Jonathon Jongsma
jjongsma at redhat.com
Fri Feb 10 20:15:41 UTC 2017
On Fri, 2017-02-10 at 06:57 -0500, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> >
> > Change current_add_drawable() to display_channel_add_drawable() and
> > current_remove_drawable() to display_channel_remove_drawable().
> > ---
> > server/display-channel.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
> > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/server/display-channel.c b/server/display-channel.c
> > index e12751b..ed00740 100644
> > --- a/server/display-channel.c
> > +++ b/server/display-channel.c
> > @@ -379,8 +379,8 @@ static void
> > pipes_add_drawable_after(DisplayChannel
> > *display,
> > }
> > }
> >
> > -static void current_add_drawable(DisplayChannel *display,
> > - Drawable *drawable, RingItem
> > *pos)
> > +static void display_channel_add_drawable(DisplayChannel *display,
> > + Drawable *drawable,
> > RingItem *pos)
> > {
> > RedSurface *surface;
> > uint32_t surface_id = drawable->surface_id;
> > @@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ static void current_add_drawable(DisplayChannel
> > *display,
> >
> > /* Unrefs the drawable and removes it from any rings that it's in,
> > as well
> > as
> > * removing any associated shadow item */
> > -static void current_remove_drawable(DisplayChannel *display,
> > Drawable *item)
> > +static void display_channel_remove_drawable(DisplayChannel
> > *display,
> > Drawable *item)
> > {
> > /* todo: move all to unref? */
> > stream_trace_add_drawable(display, item);
> > @@ -436,7 +436,7 @@ static void current_remove(DisplayChannel
> > *display,
> > TreeItem *item)
> > Drawable *drawable = SPICE_CONTAINEROF(now, Drawable,
> > tree_item.base);
> > ring_item = now->siblings_link.prev;
> > drawable_remove_from_pipes(drawable);
> > - current_remove_drawable(display, drawable);
> > + display_channel_remove_drawable(display, drawable);
> > } else {
> > Container *now_as_container = CONTAINER(now);
> >
> > @@ -523,9 +523,9 @@ static int current_add_equal(DisplayChannel
> > *display,
> > DrawItem *item, TreeItem *
> > int add_after = !!other_drawable->stream &&
> > is_drawable_independent_from_surfaces(draw
> > able);
> > stream_maintenance(display, drawable, other_drawable);
> > - current_add_drawable(display, drawable, &other-
> > >siblings_link);
> > + display_channel_add_drawable(display, drawable,
> > &other->siblings_link);
> > other_drawable->refs++;
> > - current_remove_drawable(display, other_drawable);
> > + display_channel_remove_drawable(display, other_drawable);
> > if (add_after) {
> > pipes_add_drawable_after(display, drawable,
> > other_drawable);
> > } else {
> > @@ -545,7 +545,7 @@ static int current_add_equal(DisplayChannel
> > *display,
> > DrawItem *item, TreeItem *
> > GListIter iter;
> >
> > other_drawable->refs++;
> > - current_remove_drawable(display, other_drawable);
> > + display_channel_remove_drawable(display,
> > other_drawable);
> >
> > /* sending the drawable to clients that already
> > received
> > * (or will receive) other_drawable */
> > @@ -567,9 +567,9 @@ static int current_add_equal(DisplayChannel
> > *display,
> > DrawItem *item, TreeItem *
> > break;
> > case QXL_EFFECT_OPAQUE_BRUSH:
> > if (is_same_geometry(drawable, other_drawable)) {
> > - current_add_drawable(display, drawable, &other-
> > >siblings_link);
> > + display_channel_add_drawable(display, drawable,
> > &other->siblings_link);
> > drawable_remove_from_pipes(other_drawable);
> > - current_remove_drawable(display, other_drawable);
> > + display_channel_remove_drawable(display,
> > other_drawable);
> > pipes_add_drawable(display, drawable);
> > return TRUE;
> > }
> > @@ -744,7 +744,7 @@ static int
> > current_add_with_shadow(DisplayChannel
> > *display, Ring *ring, Drawable
> > /* Prepend the draw item to the beginning of the current ring.
> > NOTE:
> > this
> > * means that the drawable is placed *before* its associated
> > shadow in
> > the
> > * tree. Changing this order will violate several unstated
> > assumptions
> > */
> > - current_add_drawable(display, item, ring);
> > + display_channel_add_drawable(display, item, ring);
> > if (item->tree_item.effect == QXL_EFFECT_OPAQUE) {
> > QRegion exclude_rgn;
> > region_clone(&exclude_rgn, &item->tree_item.base.rgn);
> > @@ -895,7 +895,7 @@ static int current_add(DisplayChannel *display,
> > Ring
> > *ring, Drawable *drawable)
> > * safety (todo: Not sure if exclude_region can affect the
> > drawable
> > * if it is added to the tree before calling
> > exclude_region).
> > */
> > - current_add_drawable(display, drawable, ring);
> > + display_channel_add_drawable(display, drawable, ring);
> > } else {
> > /*
> > * stream_detach_behind can affect the current tree since
> > @@ -903,7 +903,7 @@ static int current_add(DisplayChannel *display,
> > Ring
> > *ring, Drawable *drawable)
> > * drawable should be added to the tree before calling
> > * stream_detach_behind
> > */
> > - current_add_drawable(display, drawable, ring);
> > + display_channel_add_drawable(display, drawable, ring);
> > if (is_primary_surface(display, drawable->surface_id)) {
> > stream_detach_behind(display, &drawable-
> > >tree_item.base.rgn,
> > drawable);
> > }
> > @@ -1351,7 +1351,7 @@ static bool free_one_drawable(DisplayChannel
> > *display,
> > int force_glz_free)
> > drawable_draw(display, drawable);
> > container = drawable->tree_item.base.container;
> >
> > - current_remove_drawable(display, drawable);
> > + display_channel_remove_drawable(display, drawable);
> > container_cleanup(container);
> > return TRUE;
> > }
> > @@ -1707,7 +1707,7 @@ static void draw_until(DisplayChannel
> > *display,
> > RedSurface *surface, Drawable *l
> > now = SPICE_CONTAINEROF(ring_item, Drawable,
> > surface_list_link);
> > now->refs++;
> > container = now->tree_item.base.container;
> > - current_remove_drawable(display, now);
> > + display_channel_remove_drawable(display, now);
> > container_cleanup(container);
> > /* drawable_draw may call display_channel_draw for the
> > surfaces
> > 'now' depends on. Notice,
> > that it is valid to call display_channel_draw in this
> > case and
> > not display_channel_draw_till:
>
> Not really sure about this change.
> What about if after understanding the code we manage to encapsulate
> this "current" ?
>
Fair point. We can drop this patch if you don't think it's necessary.
Jonathon
More information about the Spice-devel
mailing list