[Spice-devel] [spice-server 03/10] Remove OutgoingHandlerInterface
Frediano Ziglio
fziglio at redhat.com
Mon Feb 13 13:19:11 UTC 2017
>
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 11:17:44AM -0500, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 10:36:10AM -0500, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > > > So are you saying you prefer an heavy unsafe signal instead of a
> > > > function call just for statistics that's disabled by default?
> > >
> > > My desktop is built on such signals and works just fine, thank you ;)
> >
> > These are patches for spice-SERVER, not spice-DESKTOP, server
> > code require more performance and safety, I agree with Gnome
> > to use such code for desktop and I'd use too.
> > A crash on server is a DoS or a security issue for instance.
>
> Once you tested your code, signals/callbacks are not really a safety
> issue, you'd catch fairly quickly memory corruptions related to that...
>
> > About performances GStreamer that use GLib for some stuff recommends
> > to not use signals as too slow but allows to register callbacks.
>
> GStreamer has very strict requirement on performance indeed, for some
> stuff they have their own GstMiniObject rather than using GObject as
> object instantiation was a significant performance hit for them.
> In the specific case of stat gathering when sending data on the network,
> you probably have a point that we should be careful that this is not too
> costly (and g_file_copy_async uses callbacks in a vaguely similar
> situation).
> However, in the general case, when some of notification is needed, I'd
> still use the generic infrastructure which is provided to us by GObject
> rather than using callbacks everywhere.
>
> Christophe
>
I think we went a bit OT a bit too generic and a bit too
grumbling. Apology from my side.
On the specific case I think we agree that is a bit heavy a signal
for statistics code that's compiled out by default.
Frediano
More information about the Spice-devel
mailing list