[Spice-devel] [PATCH spice-server 3/4] reds-stream: Introduce reds_stream_set_no_delay() helper
Christophe Fergeau
cfergeau at redhat.com
Wed Feb 15 15:04:16 UTC 2017
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 03:23:36PM +0100, Pavel Grunt wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-02-15 at 15:16 +0100, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 09:14:10AM -0500, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 06:39:13AM -0500, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Patch is good however the use of bool is inconsistent.
> > > > > Although I _much_ prefer bool/true/false we decided for
> > > > > gboolean/TRUE/FALSE.
> > > >
> > > > reds-stream.[ch] is already exclusively using bool instead of
> > > > gboolean,
> > > > so I'd prefer to stick with this. I have a patch (series) in
> > > > preparation
> > > > changing gboolean to bool (with justification), so I would not
> > > > change
> > > > reds-stream.[ch] just yet.
> > > >
> > > > Christophe
> > > >
> > >
> > > Can you be at least consistent in server/reds-stream.c ?
> > >
> > > bool -> true/false
> > >
> >
> > Existing code already uses bool together with TRUE/FALSE, so I would
> > keep the discussion about TRUE vs true for another time as well ;)
> >
>
> I am against mixing, TRUE&FALSE is gboolean, true&false is bool
>
I agree it's odd, but this is what reds-stream.c is already doing, I'd
prefer to keep things consistent for now, even though it's weird.
> imo it is simple: spice server requires C99 => we have stdbool => we
> can use it if it has benefits
I'll send a patch series related to that, imo we talk about that in
relation with that new series.
Christophe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/spice-devel/attachments/20170215/3b000169/attachment.sig>
More information about the Spice-devel
mailing list