[Spice-devel] [PATCH] tests: Fix compilation error

Christophe Fergeau cfergeau at redhat.com
Mon Jan 2 16:48:20 UTC 2017


On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 06:24:43PM +0200, Snir Sheriber wrote:
> Fix compilation error due to -Werror=maybe-uninitialized:
> 
>   CC       test-display-base.o
> test-display-base.c: In function 'do_wakeup':
> test-display-base.c:579:13: error: 'update' may be used uninitialized...
>              push_command(&update->ext);
> 
> Signed-off-by: Snir Sheriber <ssheribe at redhat.com>
> ---
>  server/tests/test-display-base.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/server/tests/test-display-base.c b/server/tests/test-display-base.c
> index 8167df5..4053ae6 100644
> --- a/server/tests/test-display-base.c
> +++ b/server/tests/test-display-base.c
> @@ -546,7 +546,7 @@ static void produce_command(Test *test)
>          case SIMPLE_DRAW_SOLID:
>          case SIMPLE_DRAW_BITMAP:
>          case SIMPLE_DRAW: {
> -            SimpleSpiceUpdate *update;
> +            SimpleSpiceUpdate *update = NULL;
>  
>              if (has_automated_tests)
>              {
> @@ -576,7 +576,8 @@ static void produce_command(Test *test)
>              default: /* Just to shut up GCC warning (-Wswitch) */
>                  break;
>              }
> -            push_command(&update->ext);
> +            if(update)
> +                push_command(&update->ext);

Is it expected in this test that we get to the 'default:' case which is
the only one not setting 'update'? If it's not expected, we should fail
the test if this happens, ie have a g_assert_not_reached() or similar
there rather than silently ignoring the unexpected command->command
value.

Christophe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/spice-devel/attachments/20170102/088d85d4/attachment.sig>


More information about the Spice-devel mailing list