[Spice-devel] [PATCH spice-server 1/6] spicevmc: Use spice_new instead of spice_malloc
Frediano Ziglio
fziglio at redhat.com
Thu Jan 26 14:43:37 UTC 2017
>
> On 01/26/2017 12:56 PM, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > spice_new is a bit more safe as return a properly typed pointer.
>
> Hi Frediano,
>
> I do not think it's much safer, as spice_new is just
As I said it's a bit safer, not much :-)
> a #define macro that (with second param 1)
> calls spice_malloc and casts from void* ; but
Yes, this is why is safer, returning a typeX * make sure
you can't do something like
typeY *p = spice_new0(typeX, 1);
which give conversion error.
> it does not hurt either, so fine by me.
>
> Uri.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio <fziglio at redhat.com>
> > ---
> > server/spicevmc.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/server/spicevmc.c b/server/spicevmc.c
> > index bbe72b5..0dc2b19 100644
> > --- a/server/spicevmc.c
> > +++ b/server/spicevmc.c
> > @@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ static void spicevmc_port_send_init(RedChannelClient
> > *rcc)
> > {
> > RedVmcChannel *channel =
> > RED_VMC_CHANNEL(red_channel_client_get_channel(rcc));
> > SpiceCharDeviceInstance *sin = channel->chardev_sin;
> > - RedPortInitPipeItem *item = spice_malloc(sizeof(RedPortInitPipeItem));
> > + RedPortInitPipeItem *item = spice_new(RedPortInitPipeItem, 1);
> >
> > red_pipe_item_init(&item->base, RED_PIPE_ITEM_TYPE_PORT_INIT);
> > item->name = strdup(sin->portname);
> > @@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ static void spicevmc_port_send_init(RedChannelClient
> > *rcc)
> >
> > static void spicevmc_port_send_event(RedChannelClient *rcc, uint8_t event)
> > {
> > - RedPortEventPipeItem *item =
> > spice_malloc(sizeof(RedPortEventPipeItem));
> > + RedPortEventPipeItem *item = spice_new(RedPortEventPipeItem, 1);
> >
> > red_pipe_item_init(&item->base, RED_PIPE_ITEM_TYPE_PORT_EVENT);
> > item->event = event;
> >
>
More information about the Spice-devel
mailing list