[Spice-devel] [spice-common] Some steps toward quic_tmpl.c and quic_rgb_tmpl.c 'unification'

[Christophe Fergeau]

Hey,

On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 07:21:25AM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > 
> > Any more thoughts/reviews on this series?
> > 
> > Christophe
> > 
> 
> I asked to have a test and you said is not worth.
> I asked to split the series in different ones and you said is not worth.
> For me a single "is not worth" is a self nack.
> So... why are you asking for though?

Ah, sounds like a misunderstanding then :) Yes I could resend these
patches as several separate series, but I tried to argue that the series
as a whole is not that complicated/scary, and could be reviewed as is.
I was expecting some pushback if you felt strongly with having separate
series :) Of course I can resend the trivial bits separately, but then
the less trivial ones (but still not very complicated ;) will be resent
as is too.

Regarding the test case, I wrote one (gave a link in one of the emails),
but it was so limited that I was not sure it was so useful to have. But
I can insert it in the series, sure.

Sounds like it was a good thing I asked what's next ;)

Christophe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/spice-devel/attachments/20170718/0d42347f/attachment.sig>