[Spice-devel] [RFC spice-gtk] Add flatpak builder manifest file for spicy

Christophe Fergeau cfergeau at redhat.com
Fri Jul 21 08:29:01 UTC 2017


Hey,

On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 10:49:48PM +0200, Pavel Grunt wrote:
> To give example for creating flatpaks depending on spice-gtk
> 

Yup, good idea, just a few minor comments:

> How to use to build and run the flatpak:

Maybe mention that the gnome 3.24 SDK has to be installed?

>  $ flatpak-builder spicy org.spicespace.spicy.json

I'd use data/org.spicespace.spicy.json
Any reason for using org.spicespace rather than org.spice-space? I think
we usually use the latter as our domain name, even though spicespace is
an alias to it.

>  $ flatpak build-export repo spicy
>  $ flatpak --user remote-add --no-gpg-verify --if-not-exists spice-repo repo
>  $ flatpak --user install spice-repo org.spicespace.spicy
>  $ flatpak run org.spicespace.spicy
> ---
>  data/org.spicespace.spicy.json | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 72 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 data/org.spicespace.spicy.json
> 
> diff --git a/data/org.spicespace.spicy.json b/data/org.spicespace.spicy.json
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..e384aff
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/data/org.spicespace.spicy.json
> @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
> +{
> +    "app-id": "org.spicespace.spicy",
> +    "runtime": "org.gnome.Platform",
> +    "runtime-version": "3.24",
> +    "sdk": "org.gnome.Sdk",
> +    "command": "spicy",
> +    "tags": ["devel", "development", "nightly"],
> +        "finish-args": [
> +        "--share=ipc", "--socket=x11",
> +        "--socket=wayland",
> +        "--filesystem=xdg-pictures",
> +        "--share=network"
> +    ],
> +    "modules": [
> +        {
> +            "name": "python-six",
> +            "buildsystem": "simple",
> +            "build-commands": [
> +                "pip3 install --target=/app six-1.10.0-py2.py3-none-any.whl"
> +            ],
> +            "sources": [
> +                {
> +                   "type": "file",
> +                   "url": "https://pypi.python.org/packages/c8/0a/b6723e1bc4c516cb687841499455a8505b44607ab535be01091c0f24f079/six-1.10.0-py2.py3-none-any.whl#md5=3ab558cf5d4f7a72611d59a81a315dc8",
> +                   "sha256": "0ff78c403d9bccf5a425a6d31a12aa6b47f1c21ca4dc2573a7e2f32a97335eb1"
> +                }
> +            ]
> +        },
> +        {
> +            "name": "pyparsing",
> +            "buildsystem": "simple",
> +            "build-commands": [
> +                "pip3 install --target=/app pyparsing-2.0.3-py2.py3-none-any.whl"
> +            ],
> +            "sources": [
> +                {
> +                    "type": "file",
> +                    "url": "https://pypi.python.org/packages/8f/f4/3a70b5e5b865b1ec45fe48dc5a57cd4facb5c7bd80e5cb1255c362732e81/pyparsing-2.0.3-py2.py3-none-any.whl#md5=4c16ef222caea2e5de741ae503aae652",
> +                    "sha256": "a9c896bab06dbf3759ad5fb63cfdb3777191e2c4ae640e6dd69ed37530f6ba56"
> +                }
> +            ]
> +        },
> +        {
> +            "builddir": true,
> +            "name": "spice-protocol",
> +            "sources": [
> +                {
> +                    "type": "git",
> +                    "url": "git://anongit.freedesktop.org/spice/spice-protocol"
> +                }
> +            ]
> +        },
> +        {
> +            "builddir": true,
> +            "name": "spice-gtk",
> +            "build-options": {
> +                "env": {
> +                    "PERL5LIB": "/app/lib/perl5",
> +                    "PYTHONPATH": "/app"
> +                }

Is that really required? Shouldn't flatpak-builder do it for us?

Christophe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/spice-devel/attachments/20170721/004cdb39/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the Spice-devel mailing list