[Spice-devel] Proposal: review branches (was Re: [vdagent-win PATCH v6 2/5] Initial rewrite of image conversion code)

[Frediano Ziglio]

> 
> Hi
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> 
> > If you are worried about more effort for PRs considering the solution
> > 2 could be an option. If patchew is able to create an "item" (actually
> > I think they call them just "series") and you are able to see the
> > merge status and change it if needed you hardly will forget a series.
> 
> I agree, and even before a series exist, it is useful to keep track of the
> discussion/feature state, and there is bugzilla (and the wiki) for that.
> 
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&list_id=620536&namedcmd=spice

This gives me "The search named spice does not exist.".

> https://www.spice-space.org/page/In_progress
> 
> For instance, the seamless series is really not "lost", if only people keep
> using bugzilla:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39238

Are you suggesting to open a bug report for every patch send to
the ML?

> 
> I am hardly convinced adding yet another way to track things will improve the
> situation, quite the contrary.
> 

These ways seems far from the series/patches level we are mainly
discussing.

Frediano