[Spice-devel] [PATCH spice-gtk v3 1/6] display-gst: check codec type before creating decoder

Christophe Fergeau cfergeau at redhat.com
Thu Jun 8 14:47:07 UTC 2017


On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 10:39:53AM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 03:55:11PM +0200, Victor Toso wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Not really worth all that discussion, your patch is ok :)
> > > 
> > > Ah, I liked the discusison mostly because this would be a spice <->
> > > spice-gtk communication bug and I'm not sure either if we should go for
> > > CRITICAL or WARNING messages in such cases.
> > > 
> > > I mean, in the past, for spice server, there was discussion about when
> > > to assert(). The result was that only when it would be a bug inside the
> > > component (never on client's input/configuration for instance)
> > > 
> > > Anyway, thanks for the discussion :)
> > 
> > To tie this in with the logging discussion, you can read the latest
> > comment from ebassi in this blog post about g_log_structured ;)
> > 
> > https://blog.gtk.org/2017/05/04/logging-and-more/
> > 
> > Christophe
> > 
> 
> Wrong thread? Looks like the structured logging would be more
> appropriate in Chistophe D thread.

Nope, the comment I refer to

«  Warnings (and criticals) are meant to be used for programmer error
and internal state consistency checks — and the expectation is that
anything that follows a warning is undefined behaviour. Personally, I
prefer asserting much more than just warning, because that catches real
programmer errors, but warnings usually have more understandable
messages. »

Christophe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/spice-devel/attachments/20170608/d467196d/attachment.sig>


More information about the Spice-devel mailing list