[Spice-devel] [PATCH spice-gtk v3] Switch over to using keycodemapdb submodule

[Daniel P. Berrange]

On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 08:16:15AM +0100, Pavel Grunt wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-03-02 at 07:59 +0100, Pavel Grunt wrote:
> > On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 10:44 +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:37:44AM +0100, Pavel Grunt wrote:
> > > > Hello Daniel,
> > > > 
> > > > On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 10:25 +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > > > Consume the keymaps.csv file from a git submodule instead of
> > > > > having
> > > > > a private copy. This makes it easier to ensure all users of
> > > > > the
> > > > > keymap
> > > > > (libvirt, gtk-vnc, spice-gtk, and eventually QEMU) to have a
> > > > > consistent
> > > > > set of data.
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > besides that it also allow us to drop the dependency on perl
> > > > (also
> > > > perl-Text-CSV is not packaged in some distros)
> > > 
> > > True yes, I intentionally kept the python code so that it only
> > > used modules base-python installs so we don't rely on external
> > > modules from pypi.
> > > 
> > > > Are there contributing rules for the keycodemapdb (where to send
> > > > the
> > > > patches etc.)?
> > > 
> > > Just send pull requests to the repo is best I think. I don't think
> > > we'd
> > > have enough traffic to warrant creating a new mailing list. In any
> > > case I would expect that most bug reports would start off with a
> > > mail
> > > and/or bug report to a project using the module. eg a mail on
> > > spice-
> > > devel,
> > > so there's little point trying to artificially move discussion to
> > > a
> > > dedicated list.
> > > 
> > > I'm happy to add any of the people with experiance of this code to
> > > the
> > > admins/committers list of the gitlab project too, so I'm not a
> > > potential
> > > bottleneck.
> > 
> > Feel free to add me (nickname "xerus")
> > 
> > > 
> > > > (For the future) Do you consider adding the
> > > > vncdisplaykeymap.[ch]
> > > > to
> > > > the repo ?
> > > 
> > > I'm unsure of the direction to take for that at this time. It
> > > would
> > > certainly be interesting to look at sharing that logic. For
> > > sharing
> > > code though, I wonder if its better to create a
> > > libgtkkeycodemap.so
> > > library rather than do a sub-module thing for that code too.
> > 
> > we have both ways in spice-common
> > 
> > About the patch - the generated file are not the same (I used git
> > diff
> > --word-diff)
> > 
> > xorgkbd2xtkbd - empty
> > xorgxquartz2xtkbd - some values are different
> > 
> > Pavel
> > 
> > https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/N9n1q2y3dZHDNhMOaIA5c15M1UNdIG
> > Yh
> > yRLivL9gydE=
> > 
> Ok, I see it is fixed in the current git master (this submodule is one
> commit behind)

Yes, just verified that accounts for the difference you see - i'll send
a new patch.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-    http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|