[Spice-devel] [PATCH spice-server v2 1/6] red-channel-client: Remove push call where not necessary
Christophe Fergeau
cfergeau at redhat.com
Mon Sep 4 15:17:36 UTC 2017
On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 10:50:44AM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 12:02:05PM +0100, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > > Now the push is done automatically when a PipeItem is added
> > > (cfr commit 5c460de1a3972b7cf2b9b2944d0b500c3affc363
> > > "worker: push data when clients can receive them"),
> > > forcing a push cause only network fragmentation and is required
> > > only if you are handling data in a loop instead of using the
> > > default loop.
> >
> > in a loop instead of using the default loop? Are you talking about
>
> yes, confusing. In some ugly point of code there are some polling loop.
> Basically instead of using events we try to send data, wait for a bit then
> try to receive and so on. So
>
> forcing a push cause only network fragmentation and is required
> only if you are handling data in a polling loop instead of using the
> default event loop.
>
> sounds better ?
Hmm, is that "instead"? Or is it that the polling loop is blocking the
default event loop/the main loop?
>
> > mainloops? I would assume mainloops, in which case I would phrase things
> > as "is required only if you are handling data in the non-default
> > mainloop (eg from a RedWorker thread)". But this does not explain why we
> > need to add a _push to red_channel_client_push_ping(), is the timer it
> > goes with only used by RedWorker?
> >
>
> this is really paranoia... can save some micro seconds maybe...
I would say this does not belong to this commit then, or you need an
explanatory comment. I can see some head scratching from someone looking
at git blame, and trying to understand theh link between what is said in
the commit log, and the addition of this _push..
Christophe
More information about the Spice-devel
mailing list