[Spice-devel] [PATCH spice-server 08/10] red-channel-client: Simplify red_channel_client_wait_pipe_item_sent loop
Frediano Ziglio
fziglio at redhat.com
Mon Sep 11 10:15:45 UTC 2017
Avoid repeating the same code twice.
red_channel_client_receive and red_channel_client_send already
check if client is blocked, no need to check manually.
Put the check for the loop inside it to avoid this duplication.
Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio <fziglio at redhat.com>
---
server/red-channel-client.c | 15 ++++++---------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/server/red-channel-client.c b/server/red-channel-client.c
index de3ac27cb..f0a25ecfd 100644
--- a/server/red-channel-client.c
+++ b/server/red-channel-client.c
@@ -1781,18 +1781,15 @@ bool red_channel_client_wait_pipe_item_sent(RedChannelClient *rcc,
red_pipe_item_ref(&mark_item->base);
red_channel_client_pipe_add_after_pos(rcc, &mark_item->base, item_pos);
- if (red_channel_client_is_blocked(rcc)) {
- red_channel_client_receive(rcc);
- red_channel_client_send(rcc);
- }
- red_channel_client_push(rcc);
-
- while (mark_item->item_in_pipe &&
- (timeout == -1 || spice_get_monotonic_time_ns() < end_time)) {
- usleep(CHANNEL_BLOCKED_SLEEP_DURATION);
+ for (;;) {
red_channel_client_receive(rcc);
red_channel_client_send(rcc);
red_channel_client_push(rcc);
+ if (!mark_item->item_in_pipe ||
+ (timeout != -1 && spice_get_monotonic_time_ns() >= end_time)) {
+ break;
+ }
+ usleep(CHANNEL_BLOCKED_SLEEP_DURATION);
}
item_in_pipe = mark_item->item_in_pipe;
--
2.13.5
More information about the Spice-devel
mailing list