[Spice-devel] [linux-agent v1 1/5] virtio-port: initialize struct before memcpy

Frediano Ziglio fziglio at redhat.com
Tue Dec 18 17:06:01 UTC 2018


> 
> From: Victor Toso <me at victortoso.com>
> 
> Found by coverity:
> 
>  | uninit_use_in_call: Using uninitialized value "message_header". Field
>  | "message_header.data" is uninitialized when calling "memcpy".
> 
> Signed-off-by: Victor Toso <victortoso at redhat.com>

This structure is defined as:

typedef struct SPICE_ATTR_PACKED VDAgentMessage {
    uint32_t protocol;
    uint32_t type;
    uint64_t opaque;
    uint32_t size;
    uint8_t data[0];
} VDAgentMessage;

so data field is 0 bytes (note also the packet attribute so there's no
padding at the end of the structure).

It's just a false positive on Coverity.

> ---
>  src/vdagentd/virtio-port.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/vdagentd/virtio-port.c b/src/vdagentd/virtio-port.c
> index e48d107..7b148d5 100644
> --- a/src/vdagentd/virtio-port.c
> +++ b/src/vdagentd/virtio-port.c
> @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ void vdagent_virtio_port_write_start(
>  {
>      struct vdagent_virtio_port_buf *wbuf, *new_wbuf;
>      VDIChunkHeader chunk_header;
> -    VDAgentMessage message_header;
> +    VDAgentMessage message_header = { 0, };
>  
>      new_wbuf = g_new(struct vdagent_virtio_port_buf, 1);
>      new_wbuf->pos = 0;

Why not replacing

    message_header.protocol = GUINT32_TO_LE(VD_AGENT_PROTOCOL);
    message_header.type = GUINT32_TO_LE(message_type);
    message_header.opaque = GUINT64_TO_LE(message_opaque);
    message_header.size = GUINT32_TO_LE(data_size);
    memcpy(new_wbuf->buf + new_wbuf->write_pos, &message_header,
           sizeof(message_header));

with

    VDAgentMessage *message_header = (VDAgentMessage *) (new_wbuf->buf + new_wbuf->write_pos);
    message_header->protocol = GUINT32_TO_LE(VD_AGENT_PROTOCOL);
    message_header->type = GUINT32_TO_LE(message_type);
    message_header->opaque = GUINT64_TO_LE(message_opaque);
    message_header->size = GUINT32_TO_LE(data_size);

(need to change other message_header usages too, chunk_header could be changed in a similar way) ?

Frediano


More information about the Spice-devel mailing list