[Spice-devel] [linux-agent v1 2/5] x11-randr: Improve argument check

[Frediano Ziglio]

> 
> From: Victor Toso <me at victortoso.com>
> 
> In the current code, output should never be negative but the check
> exists after we use the variable as index. Make the check earlier.
> 
> Found by coverity:
>   | check_after_sink: You might be using variable "output" before
>   | verifying that it is >= 0.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Victor Toso <victortoso at redhat.com>
> ---
>  src/vdagent/x11-randr.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/vdagent/x11-randr.c b/src/vdagent/x11-randr.c
> index c8e42c9..03d705f 100644
> --- a/src/vdagent/x11-randr.c
> +++ b/src/vdagent/x11-randr.c
> @@ -347,12 +347,18 @@ static int xrandr_add_and_set(struct vdagent_x11 *x11,
> int output, int x, int y,
>      int xid;
>      Status s;
>      RROutput outputs[1];
> -    int old_width  = x11->randr.monitor_sizes[output].width;
> -    int old_height = x11->randr.monitor_sizes[output].height;
> +    int old_width;
> +    int old_height;

Why not just moving these two definition below?

>  
> -    if (!x11->randr.res || output >= x11->randr.res->noutput || output < 0)
> {
> -        syslog(LOG_ERR, "%s: program error: missing RANDR or bad output",
> -               __FUNCTION__);
> +    if (output < 0) {
> +        syslog(LOG_ERR, "%s: program error: bad output", __FUNCTION__);
> +        return 0;
> +    }
> +
> +    old_width  = x11->randr.monitor_sizes[output].width;
> +    old_height = x11->randr.monitor_sizes[output].height;

I suppose skipping the output >= x11->randr.res->noutput now Coverity
should detect an overflow. I assume res and monitor_sizes arrays have both
size noutput.

> +    if (!x11->randr.res || output >= x11->randr.res->noutput) {
> +        syslog(LOG_ERR, "%s: program error: missing RANDR", __FUNCTION__);
>          return 0;
>      }
>      if (x11->set_crtc_config_not_functional) {

Frediano