[Spice-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Make plugin version checking more robust
Christophe Fergeau
cfergeau at redhat.com
Wed Mar 28 16:46:53 UTC 2018
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 06:06:19PM +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
> > If my task is to "move version check to the agent", do I _have_ to change
> > the semantics of the version check? No.
>
> Of course you have to. There is no “PluginVersionIsCompatible”
> anymore, etc, so the version number semantics have changed whether you
> like it or not. You may artificially try to make the new version
> number look like the old one, and I would have if there wasn’t another
> problem with that numbering.
Yes, "another problem", which is why it's much better if we split them...
https://www.berrange.com/posts/2012/06/27/thoughts-on-improving-openstack-git-commit-practicehistory/
This also makes the review process more complicated, as one has to
figure out what part of the patch is meant to achieve what. In this
case, I'd be fine ACK'ing the first 2 changes, but I haven't given much
thought regarding the versioning yet.
Christophe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/spice-devel/attachments/20180328/9f78f601/attachment.sig>
More information about the Spice-devel
mailing list