[Spice-devel] [PATCH spice-protocol] vd_agent: Do not define structures without fields
Frediano Ziglio
fziglio at redhat.com
Thu May 31 14:58:49 UTC 2018
>
> According to C standard the size of a structure without fields is
> not defined (see
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/21851930/size-of-empty-structure-in-c-and-c).
> As use almost use GCC we used these structures having 0-size. This is
As we almost only use GCC ...
> usually not a problem however can became a problem if 2 side talking
side -> sides
> a given protocol uses these structures.
uses -> use
> To avoid such possible mismatch (for instance having one side C and the
> other C++ which define these structure as having 1 as size) add an
define -> defines, structure -> structures
> empty (0-size array) field.
> Although a 0-size array is not considered also that portable we use
> extensively this feature with different compiler never encountering
compiler -> compilers
> issues.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio <fziglio at redhat.com>
I should have checked before sending.
> ---
> spice/vd_agent.h | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/spice/vd_agent.h b/spice/vd_agent.h
> index 7109ede..dda7044 100644
> --- a/spice/vd_agent.h
> +++ b/spice/vd_agent.h
> @@ -234,6 +234,7 @@ typedef struct SPICE_ATTR_PACKED VDAgentClipboardRelease
> {
> uint8_t selection;
> uint8_t __reserved[sizeof(uint32_t) - 1 * sizeof(uint8_t)];
> #endif
> + uint8_t dummy_empty_field[0]; /* C/C++ compatibility */
> } VDAgentClipboardRelease;
>
> typedef struct SPICE_ATTR_PACKED VDAgentMaxClipboard {
Frediano
More information about the Spice-devel
mailing list