[Spice-devel] Feature suggestion: Port tunneling between VM & client over spice-channel

[Victor Toso]

Hi,

On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 11:38:23AM +0900, Boris Morozov wrote:
> Hello, dear friends. I would like a share idea with you about
> new feature. Please forgive me if i wrong.
> 
> Current approach to publish ports from virtual machine is
> connecting it to network by network adapter.
> 
> In this case administrator should to write:
> - Routes
> - DNS-records
> - Firewall rules
> 
> In final result: 
> - Virtual machine start going to Internet from host local or
>   ISP network.
> - Virtual machine user can attack gateways and peer nodes in
>   host network.
> - Virtual machine user can attack global sites, services and
>   leave host IP it will raise problems with owners of attacked
>   sites and services, authorities.
> - Virtual machine user can download illegal or forbidden
>   content and leave host IP it will raise problems with
>   authorities.
> - Virtual machine can be attacked from other nodes in host
>   network and internet.
> Internet gateway on host network should open extra ports to
> perform access to virtual machine.
> - Some computing power of host is begin to spent on NIC and
>   network emulation. 
> - Some time of administrator was spent to configuring and
>   testing routing, dns, firewall.
> 
> To avoid this responibility and performance problems and reduce
> time on configuration when public access to virtual machine not
> needed it's better way to tunnel ports on virtual machine from
> guest and vice-versa by SPICE.

I think that was implemented at some point in the past, we do
have the deprecated type SPICE_CHANNEL_TUNNEL and AFAIK,
something like using client's internet in the guest was
supported.

> In case of port tunneling over SPICE 
> 
> 1. In virtual machine running services and they opened ports
>    (HTTP, SSH for example) on localhost (127.0.0.1). 
> 2. Spice guest agent in virtual machine open client-port and
>    become ready to connect to services ports from client-port and
>    redirect data to spice channel. 
> 3. In other end of spice channel on client spice client open
>    ports for listening incoming connections on client localhost
>    (127.0.0.1). 
> 4. Client user connect to tunneled ports on client-side
>    localhost and start working with tunneled ports as with local
>    ones. 
> 5. Spice client & guest agent perform traffic redirection.
> 
> As we can see offered approach is more simple. It can't be used
> against traditional approach in public access but in personal
> access it's look better. Also it's looks possible to tunnel not
> only localhost ports on virtual machine and others nodes ones
> if network is working. 
> 
> Use cases:
> - Web-browsing virtual machine sites on client machine
> - Web-sites, network services (daemons) development
> - Internet access in virtual machine via proxies on client
>   (TOR, VPN, SOCKS, HTTP)
> - Monitoring (getting access to API and dashboards) of various
>   services: printers, miners, solar power chargers, UPS and
>   others. 
> - File transfer between client and virtual machine via FTP,
>   SFTP, HTTP
> - Stream transfer between client and virtual machine video,
>   audio and others.
> - VDI-hosting (Isolated preinstalled VM without NIC)

Are you only suggesting the feature or do you plan to implement
it? If the later, the best way to make guest talk to client
nowadays is by using port channel. We do have a spice-webdavd
daemon that works in windows and linux guest that makes sharing a
folder possible (with WebDAV protocol).

Cheers,
Victor
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/spice-devel/attachments/20181114/b87017a9/attachment-0001.sig>