[Spice-devel] [spice-gtk v1 00/10] Flatpak + CI

[Victor Toso]

Hi,

On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 02:06:19PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Hi
> 
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 1:59 PM Victor Toso <victortoso at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 01:09:41PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > > > Having a virt-viewer flatpak does not mean _not_ having a
> > > > spicy.flatkpak (to me); one is full featured spice client while
> > > > the other a testing tool...
> > >
> > > It looks like a lot of duplication of flatpak effort. Maybe you could
> > > simply ship spicy in virt-viewer flatpak, so it could be run from
> > > command line (please no .desktop)
> >
> > Is the fact that we are installing a .desktop for spicy the only
> > issue here or you don't want to see a flatpak of spicy in the
> > gitlab-ci anyway? (btw, I'm not planning to upload this to any
> > flatpak provider).
> 
> What's the point in building a spice-gtk flatpak then, when you
> have virt-viewer flatpak?

You replied my question with another question.

My main motivation is that spicy is self contained in spice-gtk,
smaller and targeted to be a testing tool, so, testing spice-gtk
changes.

If I add virt-viewer -> flatpak or msi installer to gitlab-ci's
artifacts, that's out of scope of spice-gtk although I'll be
using it all the time...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/spice-devel/attachments/20190211/0d97cc14/attachment.sig>