[Spice-devel] [PATCH spice-protocol] Add Spice URI Scheme document

Marc-André Lureau marcandre.lureau at gmail.com
Tue Jan 8 11:54:26 UTC 2019


Hi

On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 6:56 PM Marc-André Lureau
<marcandre.lureau at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 6:43 PM Frediano Ziglio <fziglio at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau at redhat.com>
> > >
> > > A recent discussion about Spice URI scheme on the QEMU mailing list
> > > with Gerd prompted me to make an effort to standardize the Spice URIs
> > > usage. So far, it is mostly used and desribed in spice-gtk (see URI in
> > > man/spice-client.pod). But it would be more appropriate as part of
> > > spice-protocol.
> > >
> > > Based on the "vnc" URI Scheme
> > > RFC (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7869), I sketeched a Spice URI
> > > Scheme document, that should cover current URI usage in spice-gtk, and
> > > should open up possibilities for future discussions and proposals.
> > >
> > > At some point, it would also be worthwhile to follow the "vnc" scheme,
> > > and turn this into a IETF RFC and register with IANA etc.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau at redhat.com>
> >
> > I did read briefly and seems good.
> > Why not putting in spice-common/docs so we can generate the HTML too
> > easily?
>
> Whatever is the place to discuss a "common standard" works for me.
> (spice-common is more about an implementation in my mind).

So what to decide? I still prefer spice-protocol, as this is the place
I would expect that document & updates.

-- 
Marc-André Lureau


More information about the Spice-devel mailing list