[Spice-devel] [PATCH spice-server v3 00/32] Port SPICE server to Windows

Christophe Fergeau cfergeau at redhat.com
Thu Jan 31 10:16:58 UTC 2019


On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 04:57:47AM -0500, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 03:50:07AM -0500, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 04:23:56AM -0500, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > > > > ping
> > > > 
> > > > I'd drop the 'socket compatibility layer' stuff from that series to make
> > > > it shorter, a 32 patch series with no real world use case is very low
> > > > priority to me. A shorter portability patch series is more likely to get
> > > > a review from me.
> > > > 
> > > > Christophe
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Which part exactly of the "socket compatibility layer" ? If I drop
> > > everything
> > > code will end up with a lot of conditional code spread all over the code,
> > > I don't think we want to have that result.
> > 
> > I'm just suggesting to start with a smaller series without the socket
> > compatibility layer, once that is reviewed and merged, you can then send
> > that socket stuff as a second series.
> > 
> > Christophe
> > 
> 
> Sorry, still not clear.
> It seems to me you are asking for a full rewrite but you are not explaining how.
> The compatibility layer is to reduce the changes, if I remove the changes will
> be bigger but you want them smaller.

Isn't the socket compatibility layer roughly patches 6 to 18 in the
series, with most patches before and after that not needing/being
related to the socket changes?

Christophe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/spice-devel/attachments/20190131/dcf1e131/attachment.sig>


More information about the Spice-devel mailing list