[Spice-devel] [PATCH spice-server 13/13] red-channel-client: Add some comment on the flush code
Frediano Ziglio
fziglio at redhat.com
Wed Jun 12 05:54:03 UTC 2019
ping
>
> Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio <fziglio at redhat.com>
> ---
> server/red-channel-client.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/server/red-channel-client.c b/server/red-channel-client.c
> index 3fd51d78b..337733d5d 100644
> --- a/server/red-channel-client.c
> +++ b/server/red-channel-client.c
> @@ -1319,6 +1319,9 @@ void red_channel_client_push(RedChannelClient *rcc)
> /* prepare_pipe_add() will reenable WRITE events when the
> rcc->priv->pipe is empty
> * red_channel_client_ack_zero_messages_window() will reenable WRITE
> events
> * if we were waiting for acks to be received
> + * If we don't remove WRITE if we are waiting for ack we will be keep
> + * notified that we can write and we then exit (see pipe_item_get) as we
> + * are waiting for the ack consuming CPU in a tight loop
> */
> if ((red_channel_client_no_item_being_sent(rcc) &&
> g_queue_is_empty(&rcc->priv->pipe)) ||
> red_channel_client_waiting_for_ack(rcc)) {
> @@ -1326,6 +1329,9 @@ void red_channel_client_push(RedChannelClient *rcc)
> /* channel has no pending data to send so now we can flush data in
> * order to avoid data stall into buffers in case of manual
> * flushing
> + * We need to flush also in case of ack as it is possible
> + * that for a long train of small messages the message that would
> + * cause the client to send the ack is still in the queue
> */
> red_stream_flush(rcc->priv->stream);
> }
More information about the Spice-devel
mailing list