[PATCH v5] drm/virtio: Add drm_panic support

[Dmitry Osipenko]

On 11/29/24 15:24, Ryosuke Yasuoka wrote:
....
> +static int virtio_drm_get_scanout_buffer(struct drm_plane *plane,
> +					 struct drm_scanout_buffer *sb)
> +{
> +	struct virtio_gpu_object *bo;
> +
> +	if (!plane->state || !plane->state->fb || !plane->state->visible)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	bo = gem_to_virtio_gpu_obj(plane->state->fb->obj[0]);
> +	if (virtio_gpu_is_vram(bo))
> +		return -ENODEV;

VirtIO-GPU now supports importing external dmabufs, we should reject
bo->base.base.import_attach here now too.

> +
> +	/* try to vmap it if possible */
> +	if (!bo->base.vaddr) {
> +		int ret;
> +
> +		ret = drm_gem_shmem_vmap(&bo->base, &sb->map[0]);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;

I've now noticed that drm_gem_shmem_vmap() expects BO reservation lock
to be held and we can't take lock it at a panic time.

https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12.1/source/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c#L330

This resv warning isn't triggered because bo->base.vaddr is set for VT
framebufffer BO when panic happens.

We actually should reject all BOs that don't have bo->base.vaddr set at
the panic time. Please correct it in v6 and rebase on top of a recent
drm-next tree.

> +	} else {
> +		iosys_map_set_vaddr(&sb->map[0], bo->base.vaddr);
> +	}
> +
> +	sb->format = plane->state->fb->format;
> +	sb->height = plane->state->fb->height;
> +	sb->width = plane->state->fb->width;
> +	sb->pitch[0] = plane->state->fb->pitches[0];
> +	return 0;
> +}
...
> +static void virtio_panic_flush(struct drm_plane *plane)
> +{
> +	struct virtio_gpu_object *bo;
> +	struct drm_device *dev = plane->dev;
> +	struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev = dev->dev_private;
> +	struct drm_rect rect;
> +	void *p_vbuf = vgdev->panic_vbuf;
> +	struct virtio_gpu_vbuffer *vbuf_dumb_bo = p_vbuf;
> +	struct virtio_gpu_vbuffer *vbuf_resource_flush = p_vbuf + VBUFFER_SIZE;

This p_vbuf + VBUFFER_SIZE looks suspicious. The VBUFFER_SIZE macro
isn't guarded with parentheses (), hence this vbuf_resource_flush is
pointing at the CMD part of the vbuf_dumb_bo?

Won't be using kmem_cache_zalloc(vgdev->vbufs, GFP_ATOMIC) to
dynamically allocate both buffers make everything cleaner?

...
> -#define MAX_INLINE_CMD_SIZE   96
> -#define MAX_INLINE_RESP_SIZE  24
> -#define VBUFFER_SIZE          (sizeof(struct virtio_gpu_vbuffer) \
> -			       + MAX_INLINE_CMD_SIZE		 \
> -			       + MAX_INLINE_RESP_SIZE)...

-- 
Best regards,
Dmitry