[Swfdec] A lot less stability!

[Brian Pepple]

On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 20:14 +0100, Benjamin Otte wrote:
> > Maybe swfdec could be backported to the latest libsoup 2.2.x?  In many
> > cases, a backport is less intrusive that than a forward port.  Or maybe
> > the patch for libsoup-2.4 could be held in a separate branch until
> > libsoup-2.4 is released?
> >
> The reason I did this is that Gnome 2.22 will use libsoup 2.24 and
> they asked me to up the version. We intend to do a 0.6 at the end of
> February that is going to be used with Gnome 2.22 and I wanted to get
> as close to that as soon as possible.
> I was kind of skeptical about doing it, too, but in the end decided
> it'd be better to have a working http library as some testers for one
> month.

Wasn't that upgrade to libsoup for gnome 2.22 an error?  I seem to
recall mclasen mentioning on irc last week that he was going to talk to
Owen about it.

Later,
/B
-- 
Brian Pepple <bpepple at fedoraproject.org>

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BrianPepple
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/swfdec/attachments/20080125/8d6dd101/attachment.pgp