[SyncEvolution] SyncEvolution 1.3.99.6 released

[Patrick Ohly]

On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 12:25 +0100, tino.keitel+syncevolution at tikei.de
wrote:
> I totally missed the 1.3.99.6 release because the mail was a reply to
> an old announcement and was sorted into an old mail thread.

I use Evolution's "edit as new message" to clone the previous
announcement, which usually starts a new mail thread. However, the
previous announcement also already had an "in-reply-to" header, so at
some point in the past I must have made the mistake of using reply-to.
The next announcement will be a truly virgin email where I just
cut-and-paste text, I swear ;-/

> I also regulary checked https://syncevolution.org/blogs
> where all the other 1.3.99.x versions were mentioned, but 1.3.99.6 is
> missing there, too.

Good point, I forgot to publish that. In my release checklist it's a
separate point from writing the post, but this time I wasn't quite
following that list (lot of last minute changes, etc.) and forgot about
that point.

> Regarding libsynthesis, the
> libsynthesis_3.4.0.47+syncevolution-1-3-99-6 git tag is missing commit
> 572bba1742c290607755e6ec2e95c5e0733466f4 which bumbs the libsynthesis
> version to 3.4.0.47.1, but syncevolution 1.3.99.6 requires 3.4.0.47.1.

The libsynthesis_3.4.0.47+syncevolution-1-3-99-6 git tag has the commit
(http://cgit.freedesktop.org/SyncEvolution/libsynthesis/commit/?id=572bba1742c290607755e6ec2e95c5e0733466f4), the release wouldn't have compiled otherwise. It's just master that hadn't been updated to that tag yet. Fixed.

> Sorry for complaining so much. :-)

Not at all, thanks for pointing this out.

-- 
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly

The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.