[systemd-bugs] [Bug 70856] PrivateTmp works incorrectly with `mount --make-rprivate /`
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Fri Apr 11 08:32:52 PDT 2014
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70856
--- Comment #8 from Lennart Poettering <lennart at poettering.net> ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> However, `mount --make-rprivate /` is needed to get LXC containers to work.
I don't think that is true. I have no experience with LXC, but libvirt-lxc and
systemd-nspawn have no issue with this at all. If LXC chokes on this it should
really be fixed. LXC needs to do the same as nspawn and libvirt-lxc and do the
equivalent of "mount --make-rslave /" *after* creating the container's fs
namespace, from inside of it, in order to stop propagation of mounts from the
container into the host but not vice versa.
> I mean that if service is not using `PrivateTmp` option, then any unmounts
> are propagated to the processes running inside service. Even if `mount
> --make-rprivate /` was issued before.
>
> So, problem arises ONLY if PrivateTmp and make-rprivate using together.
Yes. That's correct. So don't use make-rprivate on root. it's incompatible with
privatetmp.
> Please, take a careful look on scenario I attached at first comment.
>
> Unmounts are propagated:
> # mount --make-rprivate /
> # mount blahblah /mnt
> # systemctl start ntpd (without PrivateTmp option in ntpd.service)
> # umount /mnt
>
> Unmounts are NOT propagated and unmounting /mnt CAUSES A PROBLEM:
> # mount --make-rprivate /
> # mount blahblah /mnt
> # systemctl start ntpd (WITH PrivateTmp option in ntpd.service, which is
> default)
> # umount /mnt
>
> Hope it is clear enough...
Yeah, again, we don't support this. Either stop using PrivateTmp= or stop using
make-rprivate on root. We don't support both in combination. Sorry.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-bugs/attachments/20140411/ee81d212/attachment.html>
More information about the systemd-bugs
mailing list