[systemd-bugs] [Bug 87037] Some mouse DPI data

bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Mon Dec 8 14:19:27 PST 2014


https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87037

--- Comment #6 from Zbigniew Jedrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek at in.waw.pl> ---
(In reply to Peter Hutterer from comment #5)
> > mouse:*:*:name:ImExPS/2 Logitech Wheel Mouse:
> >  MOUSE_DPI=400 at 250
> 
> yeah, do we know that all of these have the same DPI? I'm pretty sure there
> are more devices that register with that name. I guess we can push it and
> figure it out :)
Yeah, especially that if anything, they might have *lower* resolutions, so
400 is a better default for them than 1000.

> > OTOH, this one is problematic:
> > > mouse:usb:v046dpc52b:name:Logitech Unifying Device. Wireless PID:4008:
> > >  MOUSE_DPI=800 at 166
> > The receiver is too generic. Here I have
> > 
> > mouse:usb:v046dpc52b:name:Logitech Unifying Device. Wireless PID:
> >  MOUSE_DPI=1000 at 125
> > 
> > from a M505/B605 mouse.
>  
> > Would it be possible to match on the actual device that is connected to the
> > receiver? I see that upower has special support for LG devices [1,2]. Maybe
> > it could export the label of the device as an udev attribute and we could
> > key of that then?
> 
> Benjamin Tissoires has a patchset waiting for v3.19 that exports the name of
> the device. So your M505 should have the name M505 (of B605, not sure). Note
> that Alexandre's line has the wireless PID included in the name, that's
> enough to identify the device without the name. Your line doesn't, not sure
> why though.
Copy-paste-error. It should be:

mouse:usb:v046dpc52b:name:Logitech Unifying Device. Wireless PID:101d:
 MOUSE_DPI=900 at 166

This is a bit surprising. I'm pretty sure I got slightly different results
yesterday, but maybe it was a typo.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-bugs/attachments/20141208/3d398054/attachment.html>


More information about the systemd-bugs mailing list