[systemd-devel] [PATCH 1/4] Adding halt binary to shutdown the system

[Fabiano Fidêncio]

On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Michael Biebl <mbiebl at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2010/10/1 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <barbieri at profusion.mobi>:
>> On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Michael Biebl <mbiebl at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 2010/10/1 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <barbieri at profusion.mobi>:
>>>> From: Fabiano Fidencio <fidencio at profusion.mobi>
>>>>
>>>> This functions are working as follows:
>>>>    - Send a SIGTERM to all process
>>>>    - Send a SIGKILL to all process
>>>>    - Try to umount all mount points
>>>>    - Try to remount read-only all mount points that can't
>>>>    be umounted
>>>
>>> What about remote mounts (e.g. NFS requiring portmap) or fuse mounts?
>>> If you kill their processes before unmounting you can not unmount
>>> those fs cleanly.
>>
>> IMO these should be stopped while at systemd's units. After all, if
>> units were started and then stopped by systemd, the server processes
>> are over already.
>
> Sorry, I don't understand what you are saying.
>
> Say I have an NFS and/or fuse mount in /etc/fstab.
> Which unit file you are talking about should be dealing with
> unmounting this nfs mount?

NFS is being umounted. I'm passing MNT_FORCE to umount2 (in umount.c)
About fuse, Which is the problem in try to umount using umount2?

>
>
> --
> Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
> universe are pointed away from Earth?
> _______________________________________________
> systemd-devel mailing list
> systemd-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
>



-- 
Fabiano Fidêncio
ProFUSION embedded systems
http://www.profusion.mobi