[systemd-devel] Designing a scheduler interface

[Stef Bon]

Well, your email suprises me, really.
Yes I read some sort of apologies, but he is expecting someone is
dissapointed he's not reacting. If that's not arrogant, I'm a marsian.

I will raise a fund to support all of those who are dissapointed by
him not reacting... Yek

Much better would be just: I cannot react right now, but this issue
has my interest. I expect to react later..
In communication it's very important to treat each other with respect.
As soccertrainer (and maybe soon teacher mathematics) I really think
that's important when working together.

Stef Bon

2011/4/19 Michal Schmidt <mschmidt at redhat.com>:
> On 04/18/2011 11:04 PM, Stef Bon wrote:
>>
>> 2011/1/17 Lennart Poettering<mzkqt at 0pointer.de>:
>>>
>>> possible is via xattr support in procfs and cgroupfs.
>>>
>>> Anyway, as mentioned, I am not really ready to discuss this now. Sorry
>>> of that might sound disappointing.
>>>
>>
>> Why do think anyone is disappointed, by you not reacting? Do you
>> really think that????
>
> Since the original message called for some cooperation with systemd and
> systemd-devel was CC'd, it was only logical to assume that a response from
> the systemd developer was expected.
>
>> I'snt it a bit arrogant to think this?
>>
>> In my opinion people are can be disappointed by the way we are treated
>> by another, not by what we do or don't.
>>
>> I've been called arrogant before, but you are really king here!
>>
>> Hale king Lennart!
>
> Lennart's response consisted of 4 informative paragraphs and a closing
> apology for not being yet more helpful.
> In what universe is this considered arrogant?
>
> Michal
>