[systemd-devel] SecureBits documentation is wrong?

Lennart Poettering lennart at poettering.net
Mon Aug 29 04:45:18 PDT 2011

On Sun, 28.08.11 16:50, Kant (fnord.hammer at gmail.com) wrote:

> Hi,
> >SecureBits=
> >       Controls the secure bits set for the executed process. See
> >       capabilities(7) for details. Takes a list of strings: keep-caps,
> >       keep-caps-locked, no-setuid-fixup, no-setuid-fixup-locked,
> >       no-setuid-noroot and/or no-setuid-noroot-locked.
> There are no securebits named no-setuid-noroot and no-setuid-noroot-locked.

Indeed. The code was alright (i.e. used "noroot" as name, with no bogus
"no-setuid-" prefix), this was a bug in the manpage which i fixeded now.

Thanks for the pointer!


Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.

More information about the systemd-devel mailing list