[systemd-devel] RFC: creating a set of systemd RPM macros across distributions ?

[Frederic Crozat]

Le lundi 27 juin 2011 à 14:38 +0200, Lennart Poettering a écrit :
> On Mon, 27.06.11 14:34, Frederic Crozat (fcrozat at suse.com) wrote:
> 
> > > > %service_add_enabled()
> > > > if [ "$1" -eq 1 ] ; then 
> > > > # Initial installation
> > > > /bin/systemctl enable %{1}.service >/dev/null 2>&1 || :
> > > > fi
> > > 
> > > I'd strongly advise against this. Units might install more than one
> > > service, and other units instead of services (example: sshd might just
> > > enable a socket by default, but not a service). Hence we should not
> > > appaned .service but leave it to the package to specifiy the full name
> > > and we also need to make sure packagers can specify multiple unit files
> > > at once.
> > 
> > This question was also spotted on opensuse-packaging and we thought it
> > should be discussed here :)
> > 
> > So, usage would become :
> > 
> > %post 
> > %service_add ssh.socket
> > 
> > %post
> > %service_add_enabled foobar.service 
> > 
> > ?
> 
> Well, and maybe even this:
> 
> %service_add waldi.socket wuffwuff.service piepapo.service
> 
> i.e. allow multiple unit names to be specified at once.

It shouldn't be a problem, I just need to refresh my rpm macro
kung-fu ;)

-- 
Frederic Crozat <fcrozat at suse.com>
SUSE