[systemd-devel] [Netatalk-admins] Restart=always and "ExecStartPre" (netatalk)

[Reindl Harald]

Am 12.10.2011 15:57, schrieb Frank Lahm:
> 2011/10/12 Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net>:
>> Am 12.10.2011 15:35, schrieb HAT:
>> From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net>, 05 Oct 2011 12:32:00 +0200
>>
>>>>> /lib/systemd/system/netatalk-afpd.service
>>>>> /lib/systemd/system/netatalk-cnid.service
>>>>> /lib/systemd/system/netatalk-atalk.service
>>
>>> there are a lot of manuals but the most relevant in my opinion are
>>> http://0pointer.de/public/systemd-man/systemd.unit.html
>>> http://0pointer.de/public/systemd-man/systemd.service.html
>>> http://0pointer.de/public/systemd-man/systemd.exec.html
>> Hmmm. It may be possible.
>> If you send more suitable afpd.service and cnid_metad.service to me,
>> I will try to write atalkd.service, papd.service and so on.
>>
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> My problem is that i did not get "cnid_metad" started as a own
>> service, i tried Type=simple and Type=forked, it will be started
>> and somehow the process closed without any error
>>
>> seems like a bug in netatalk
> 
> Guess not. According to
> <http://0pointer.de/public/systemd-man/systemd.service.html> it's
> Type=forking, not Type=forked.
> Of course cnid_metad daemonizes. Also I'd utilize PIDFile=... 

was a typo in my last mail

i used the "type=" in my tests from copy&paste of working services
no idea why "cnid_metad" did not want to start via systemd

i will try this again next weekend and let you know my results
do you have any F15 machine / VM to analyze what happens
if i do not get it running?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/attachments/20111012/83c627f6/attachment-0001.pgp>