[systemd-devel] Fwd: dovecot and systemd

["Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"]

On 04/05/2012 11:13 AM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> Can't answer this specific part, but I guess a longer term solution
> (that is much more intrusive and arguably one you don't necessarily want
> to support) is to split out the different services that dovecot offers
> into separate systemd units, each of which can be configured separately
> with their own .socket unit (templated or otherwise).

Agreed the best thing to do here is to split out the service...

JBG