[systemd-devel] Re-exec()ing services for 'systemctl restart' ?
Daniel P. Berrange
berrange at redhat.com
Mon Aug 6 08:52:02 PDT 2012
For libvirt, we (will soon) have a daemon (virtlockd) which maintains
exclusive fcntl() based locks on disk images/devices, on behalf of both
libvirtd and any running QEMU or LXC instances. This is a safety critical
daemon (hence separate from libvirtd), to the extent that if the daemon
stops / crashes, the entire host should be immediately fenced using a
kernel watchdog and/or hardware power control device.
We still want to be able to restart this daemon during RPM upgrades to
newer versions, but we can't use a normal stop+start sequence, because
that will loose locks for any active VMs. Thus the daemon has the ability
to re-exec() itself triggered by SIGUSR1, preserving its critical state.
I've read the manpages for .service, .exec, etc but I've not seen any
reference to changing config such that
# systemctl restart virtdlockd.service
will simply send SIGUSR1 to the process, instead of stopping it and then
starting it again. Obviously I could make the RPM %post send SIGUSR1
directly and ignore systemctl, but that doesn't help admins who just
expect to use systemctl. So I want to know if there is a recommended
way to handle this kind of use case ?
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
More information about the systemd-devel
mailing list