[systemd-devel] Integration with Buildroot (uclibc-based runtime): patches suggested

Kay Sievers kay at vrfy.org
Fri Jul 13 06:58:23 PDT 2012


On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Tomasz Torcz <tomek at pipebreaker.pl> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 09:19:01AM -0400, Dmitry Golubovsky wrote:
>> Buildroot's toolchain by default provides runtime environment based on
>> uclibc [2] which lacks certain functionality systemd depends upon, so
>> I had to develop some workarounds. In particular, functions like
>> execvpe, posix_fallocate, mkostemp,  and %ms format are not
>> implemented.
>>
>
>> These patches are applicable against the v186 snapshot.
>>
>> I would like to hear from the systemd dev team whether there is an
>> interest in uclibc integration; we can work together on finalizing
>> these patches. If there is no such interest, patches will remain with
>> Buildroot as they currently are.
>
>   Wouldn't it be better (and beneficial to others) to implement missing
> functionality in uclibc?

Looks like. All of these functions seem generally useful and should
not be worked around in user code which relies on them.

Kay


More information about the systemd-devel mailing list