[systemd-devel] setting up to allow separate udev and systemd builds
m.olbrich at pengutronix.de
Tue Jun 19 04:10:01 PDT 2012
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:21:58AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Fri, 15.06.12 20:06, Bryan Kadzban (bryan at kadzban.is-a-geek.net) wrote:
> > dbus
> > libcap
> I am quite happy with depending on these two as it makes little sense to
> build an OS without it, unless you go super minimal in which case
> sysemd/udev are not relevant.
For embedded distros udev without systemd is a very real usecase.
> > m4
> > intltool
> > gperf (--enable-keymap will require gperf for a udev build as well)
> These are only build-time deps, and hence are totally OK to have.
I don't care about these. But cross-compiling dbus when it's not actually
wanted or needed is not ok.
> I mean, the next thing you come up with is a patch to not require
> automake and use only make, just because you have a problem with
> dependencies? I mean, seriously.
This is uncalled for. Depending on a good build-system is ok. But it was
clearly stated that using udev without systemd will still be possible. I
don't see why it should not be possible to build udev without systemd and
therefore any extra dependencies.
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the systemd-devel