[systemd-devel] RFC : PATCH: initial implementation of system wide rlimit

[Frederic Crozat]

Le mardi 03 avril 2012 à 15:44 +0200, Frederic Crozat a écrit :
> Le lundi 02 avril 2012 à 22:59 +0200, Lennart Poettering a écrit :
> > On Fri, 30.03.12 17:20, Frederic Crozat (fcrozat at suse.com) wrote:
> > 
> > > >From 5008080dda662208278c159213adbd5211496043 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: Frederic Crozat <fcrozat at suse.com>
> > > Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 17:53:41 +0200
> > > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] macro: add newdup macro, equivalent of new + memdup but
> > >  type-safe
> > > 
> > > ---
> > >  src/macro.h |    1 +
> > >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/src/macro.h b/src/macro.h
> > > index 19f259e..a85e72d 100644
> > > --- a/src/macro.h
> > > +++ b/src/macro.h
> > > @@ -137,6 +137,7 @@ static inline size_t ALIGN_TO(size_t l, size_t ali) {
> > >  
> > >  #define memzero(x,l) (memset((x), 0, (l)))
> > >  #define zero(x) (memzero(&(x), sizeof(x)))
> > > +#define newdup(x,l) ( (x= new(typeof(*l),1)) ? memcpy((x),(l),sizeof(*l)) : NULL)
> > 
> > Hmm, I was more thinking of a definition much closer to new() and
> > new0(), without typeof, but with allowing allocation of an array
> > 
> > #define newdup(t, p, n) ((t*)memdup(p,sizeof(t)*(n)))
> 
> New version attached, based on your comments.

Rebased version, including a fix to newdup macro which went to git some
weeks ago.

-- 
Frederic Crozat <fcrozat at suse.com>
SUSE