[systemd-devel] [PATCH] Highlight ordering cycle deletions
Olivier Brunel
i.am.jack.mail at gmail.com
Sun Nov 4 15:28:45 PST 2012
Having unit(s) removed/not started, even if it solved the issue and allowed
to boot successfully, should still be considered an error, as something
clearly isn't right.
This patch elevates the log message from warning to error, and adds a status
message to make things more obvious.
Signed-off-by: Olivier Brunel <i.am.jack.mail at gmail.com>
---
src/core/transaction.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/core/transaction.c b/src/core/transaction.c
index 4bce942..ee6992a 100644
--- a/src/core/transaction.c
+++ b/src/core/transaction.c
@@ -374,7 +374,8 @@ static int transaction_verify_order_one(Transaction *tr, Job *j, Job *from, unsi
if (delete) {
- log_warning("Breaking ordering cycle by deleting job %s/%s", delete->unit->id, job_type_to_string(delete->type));
+ log_error("Breaking ordering cycle by deleting job %s/%s", delete->unit->id, job_type_to_string(delete->type));
+ status_printf(ANSI_HIGHLIGHT_RED_ON " SKIP " ANSI_HIGHLIGHT_OFF, true, "Ordering cycle found, skip %s", unit_description(delete->unit));
transaction_delete_unit(tr, delete->unit);
return -EAGAIN;
}
--
1.8.0
More information about the systemd-devel
mailing list