[systemd-devel] [PATCH] Properly handle device aliases used as dependencies
Dave Reisner
d at falconindy.com
Wed Oct 17 07:08:45 PDT 2012
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 04:43:10PM -0400, Eelco Dolstra wrote:
> If a device unit has aliases defined in udev rules, and there are
> other units that depend on that alias, as in
>
> BindTo=sys-subsystem-net-devices-eth0.device
>
> then systemd will fail the start the alias, and any dependent units
> will time out. See
>
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52580
>
> This is because unit_add_name() in device_add_escaped_name() will
> return EEXIST.
>
> The solution taken here is to call device_update_unit() on the alias
> name. Thus if a unit with the alias name already exists, we reuse it;
> otherwise a new unit is created. Creating multiple units for a single
> device is perhaps suboptimal, but it's consistent with the treatment
> of udev symlinks in device_process_new_device().
> ---
This seems to have been skipped over. I've pushed it now. Thanks!
> src/core/device.c | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/core/device.c b/src/core/device.c
> index 8121dc9..be76caf 100644
> --- a/src/core/device.c
> +++ b/src/core/device.c
> @@ -269,11 +269,8 @@ static int device_update_unit(Manager *m, struct udev_device *dev, const char *p
> log_warning("SYSTEMD_ALIAS for %s is not a path, ignoring: %s", sysfs, e);
> free(e);
> } else {
> -
> - r = device_add_escaped_name(u, e);
> + device_update_unit(m, dev, e, false);
> free(e);
> - if (r < 0)
> - goto fail;
> }
> }
> }
> --
> 1.7.11.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> systemd-devel mailing list
> systemd-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
More information about the systemd-devel
mailing list