[systemd-devel] [Lxc-users] Unable to run systemd in an LXC / cgroup container.

[Michael H. Warfield]

On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 09:07 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Michael H. Warfield (mhw at WittsEnd.com):

> > > nm...  I see it.  It's in git and hasn't made it to a release.  I'm
> > > working on a git build to test now.  If this is something that solves
> > > some of this, we need to move things along here and get these things
> > > moved out.  According to git, 0.8.0rc2 was 7 months ago?  What's the
> > > show stoppers here?
> > 
> > While the git repo says 7 months ago, the date stamp on the
> > lxc-0.8.0-rc2 tarball is from July 10, so about 3-1/2 months ago.
> > Sounds like we've accumulated some features (like the hooks) we are
> > going to need like months ago to deal with this systemd debacle.  How
> > close are we to either 0.8.0rc3 or 0.8.0?  Any blockers or are we just
> > waiting on some more features?

> Daniel has simply been too busy.

Don't I know THAT feeling all too well.  Over on the Samba Team (where
I'm the chief security consultant on the team) we're all too busy with
juggling our domain and our web cert.  On top of that, I've got my day
job (of course).  On top of that, I've got about six other OpenSource
projects I'm juggling (including this one).  On top of that, I've got a
consulting customer that's going through fits.  And the beat goes on.

I'll test out things as fast as I can.  I need this.  This suddenly got
very interesting as soon as we had a thread to pick at on the systemd
ball of yarn.

> Stéphane has made a new branch which
> cherrypicks 50 bugfixes for 0.8.0, with the remaining patches (about
> twice as many) left for 0.9.0.  I'm hoping we get 0.8.0 next week :)

I'm hoping the hook patches are in that cherry picked basket.  We really
need them if that's what it takes to make this work.  Looking forward to
it. :-)=)

I'm going to look further into this whole redirect /dev/console to a log
hang thing.  That's not good and may need to be resolved soon as well.
I can live with losing the vty's although I disagree with Stéphan's
arguments.  They (systemd) are behaving significantly different from
sysvinit and upstart and they claim they want to be transparent?  Not.
No matter.  We need to make that work properly as well, agree with them
or disagree with them.

Regards,
Mike
-- 
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 985-6132 |  mhw at WittsEnd.com
   /\/\|=mhw=|\/\/          | (678) 463-0932 |  http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
   NIC whois: MHW9          | An optimist believes we live in the best of all
 PGP Key: 0x674627FF        | possible worlds.  A pessimist is sure of it!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 482 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/attachments/20121026/fcdb0d89/attachment.pgp>