[systemd-devel] [PATCH] cgtop: Add cpu time opt and become stdout sensitive
Umut Tezduyar
umut at tezduyar.com
Sun Apr 7 08:23:51 PDT 2013
Hi,
I also agree that it makes most sense to have it formatted by
format_timespan. I don't think we should have 2 different outputs (if on
tty). I think it will only be confusing. If no one gets to it before me, I
will have it replaced with format_timespan sometime in the close future :).
Thanks.
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbyszek at in.waw.pl> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 05:44:34PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Tue, 02.04.13 18:52, Umut Tezduyar (umut at tezduyar.com) wrote:
> >
> > > + if (arg_cpu_type == CPU_PERCENT)
> > > + if (g->cpu_valid)
> > > + printf(" %6.1f", g->cpu_fraction*100);
> > > + else
> > > + fputs(" -", stdout);
> > > else
> > > - fputs(" -", stdout);
> > > + printf(" %*"PRIu64, maxtcpu, g->cpu_usage)
> >
> > I wonder if this is something where format_timespan() would be
> > useful?
> >
> > Or do you want to process this further and thus want a raw value? For
> > humans the result of format_timespan() should be a lot more useful
> > though...
> I think it should use format_timespan() when !on_tty(). It's mostly
> unusable now, apart from a slight comic effect:
>
> / 1109 2070853593984205 - -
> -
> /user/zbyszek/9 747 0 - -
> -
>
> Zbyszek
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/attachments/20130407/2f907ded/attachment.html>
More information about the systemd-devel
mailing list