[systemd-devel] [PATCH] man: link systemd-static-nodes.service

Umut Tezduyar umut at tezduyar.com
Mon Apr 22 08:13:24 PDT 2013


Hi,

The way I see it is "systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service" is no different than
"systemd-static-nodes.service" except later is restricted to /dev and runs
before udev. Due to this similarity I thought man:systemd-tmpfiles is the
best place to mention of "systemd-static-nodes.service". If that is not the
case, then "systemd-static-nodes.service" still needs to be listed
somewhere in man list.


On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Kay Sievers <kay at vrfy.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Umut Tezduyar <umut at tezduyar.com> wrote:
> > ---
> >  man/systemd-tmpfiles.xml                |    2 ++
> >  units/systemd-static-nodes.service.in   |    1 +
> >  units/systemd-tmpfiles-clean.service.in |    2 +-
> >  units/systemd-tmpfiles-clean.timer      |    2 +-
> >  units/systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service.in |    2 +-
> >  5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/man/systemd-tmpfiles.xml b/man/systemd-tmpfiles.xml
> > index 22744c7..0e22915 100644
> > --- a/man/systemd-tmpfiles.xml
> > +++ b/man/systemd-tmpfiles.xml
> > @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@
> >                  <refname>systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service</refname>
> >                  <refname>systemd-tmpfiles-clean.service</refname>
> >                  <refname>systemd-tmpfiles-clean.timer</refname>
> > +                <refname>systemd-static-nodes.service</refname>
>
> Hmm, why should we list a specific user of this tool in its doc
> section, the ones listed there are so far all part of the tool itself?
>
> Kay
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/attachments/20130422/38b1cf1a/attachment.html>


More information about the systemd-devel mailing list