[systemd-devel] build failures in latest master from d848b9cbfa0ba72381363accce481600169df2eb

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbyszek at in.waw.pl
Thu Feb 7 13:28:03 PST 2013


On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 02:38:26PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> <zbyszek at in.waw.pl> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 02:43:32PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >> 2013/2/5 Colin Walters <walters at verbum.org>:
> >> > On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 13:10 +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> We do not want to place shared libraries with private APIs in the
> >> >> system. Other people might rely on stuff which we can never track.
> >> >
> >> > Note that it installs into a private subdirectory, so people writing
> >> > apps can't just use -lsystemd-shared in their linker lines in their
> >> > build systems, and unless they also go to the effort of adding an rpath
> >> > or LD_LIBRARY_PATH for /usr/lib/systemd/private to their executables,
> >> > dynamic linking will also fail.
> >>
> >> Please don't add such a private shared library. Aside from being ugly
> >> and having systemd and it's tools have to use an RPATH, it makes (as
> >> already mentioned) packaging udev separately harder. I think a few KB
> >> of disk space do not warrant that change.
> > OK, I guess that this is not an option.
> >
> > I now pushed a simple patch from David Strauss which adds an additional
> > dependency and fixes the build.
> 
> We cannot do that. Libudev should not link the dynamic libs from systemd.
> 
> I changed it now and people with the non-working --as-needed need to
> check if that works for them ...
Thanks, your approach is much better. Is is actually necesary
to apply the same fix to libsystemd-journal. I'm pushing a fix.

Zbyszek


More information about the systemd-devel mailing list