[systemd-devel] [PATCH] use static_assert instead of assert_cc
Lennart Poettering
lennart at poettering.net
Thu Jan 3 13:34:03 PST 2013
On Sat, 29.12.12 02:10, Thomas H.P. Andersen (phomes at gmail.com) wrote:
> Another item from the todo
Heya!
Hmm, so I commited a patch for using assert_static() a few days before
you did your patches but unfortunately never commited it.
It works a bit differently from your patch, i.e. keeps assert_cc() as
special version of assert_static() around which only takes one rather
than two parameters and generates the message from the passed
expression.
I am tempted to just leave this code now as I commited it, since having
to pass an explicit string to assert_static() is sometimes a bit
redundant i'd say, and doesn't really make things more readable unless
the expression that is tested is really complicated.
Hence, I'd say that we should use assert_cc() and assert_static() from
now on like this:
assert_cc() for simple expressions where the expression is readable
enough as is.
assert_static() for complex expressions where it is worth specifying a
human readable string.
I hope this makes sense?
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.
More information about the systemd-devel
mailing list